Nations prepare for conflict in the South Caucasus, just in case. Russia strengthens the preparedness of its military facilities in the region.

The Russian newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta has reported that the Russian government has been taking steps to strengthen its military presence in the South Caucasus.

The newspaper reported that the number of personnel at the Russian military base in Gyumri in Armenia has increased two and half times over the last year, although the increase was mainly in locally enlisted personnel and the number of Russian troops remained stable at around 5000. The newspaper said that the Russian government had taken similar measures in its bases in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.. The newspaper cites possible escalation in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and a possible attack on Iran as reasons for the need to increase the state of military readiness of the bases in the South Caucasus.

In the meantime, a statement by the Press Service of the Southern Military District of the Russian Federation said earlier in the week that Russian military experts under the leadership of the commander of the brigade had been doing specialised training to work out practical steps to organize data exchange between users within common automated system management connections in the mountainous terrain of Armenia.

The training involved modern radio station based on KAMAZ-43114 and BTR-80, which were received by the Southern Military District in 2012, as part of the modernisation programme of the Russian Armed Forces.

The news comes at the same time that Azerbaijan has announced that it will increase its military budget this year to US$3.7 billion.

Tension between Armenia and Azerbaijan, who technically are still in a state of war with each other, is increasing around the issue of the opening of the airport in Nagorno-Karabakh.

On Friday the Cabinet of Ministers of Azerbaijan adopted a decision "On the use of airspace of Azerbaijan". According the the news agency APA the decision elaborates the procedure to be adopted by the Azerbaijani armed forces in case Azerbaijani airspace, which Azerbaijan interprets as including the airspace over Nagorno-Karabakh is violated. The decision permits the Armed Forces to shoot down a plane that violates the air space as a last resort. On the same day other reports in the Azerbaijani media stated that Mig 29 aircraft of the Azerbaijani Airforce were patrolling the airspace over the regions of Agdan and Terter that are currently occupied by Armenia.

Armenian Defence Minister Seyran Ohanyan said in Yerevan that Armenian Air Defence Forces will not tolerate the shooting down of planes and will ensure the security of civilian flights from Yerevan to Stepanakert. Ohanyan told reporters there is still a threat of hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan, but the analysis of the current situation shows there is little likelihood of a new war.

For the last four days Azerbaijani media has been reporting that Armenian forces had been shooting daily against Azerbaijani forces on the line of contact in the region of Agdam.

The situation in the region is being closely monitored by other parties. A senior official of the European Union said in Brussels last month that the EU had increased satellite monitoring of the military situation around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

In a comment to APA, former senior US diplomat Mathew Bryza said

"I don't expect a war in the region as it is said in the reports of some non-governmental organizations. The war may start only after the deliberate decision of one of the parties. I think that Armenia and Azerbaijan are not interested in it. The establishment of confidence between the sides and coexistence of the two peoples are more acceptable than a war."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"It is difficult to reconcile the reality of what is happening on the ground, the bellicose statements of Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders and the true intentions of the parties. All sides are raising the stakes. In the meantime everybody seems to be taking precautions, just in case. This volatile situation is going to make 2013 a difficult one for the region unless there is a breakthrough in the peace negotiations."

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Russian and Armenian forces in a joint military exercise around the Russian militarty base in Gyumri.(archive picture courtesy of ArmeniaNow)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)