Iran's complex relations with the South Caucasus. Sergey Markedonov and Richard Giragosian comment on Iran's relations with the region.

A few days ago a rather bizarre discussion took place in the Parliament of Azerbaijan, a place not usually known for surprises or spontaneity. One MP stood up to propose that Azerbaijan should change its name and be known forthwith as North Azerbaijan. Another stood up to support his idea, followed by another, and another. The incident created quite a lot of attention and speculation.

The incident highlighted the complex relations of Iran with the South Caucasus, a region that for centuries was occupied by Persians and that still shares many legacies of this period. There are then the millions of people in todays Iran that are ethnic Azeris as the map shows. In recent years some political circles in Baku have started referring to the area where these Azeris live as South Azerbaijan. The members of parliament by suggesting that Azerbaijan be called North Azerbaijan, were bringing attention to this point, without saying much about.

Iran also has a complicated relationship with Armenia. An influential Armenian community lives in Tehran where it is allowed to practise its religion and customs. In the current complicated geopolitical situation Iran and Armenia have maintained good warm relations with each other.

Two of our regular contributors discuss Iran's complex relations with the South Caucasus. Richard Giragosian in his piece for the English edition says "Armenia’s relationship with Iran that raises concerns and poses challenges.  And as the West imposes ever tighter sanctions against Iran and the threat of military action over Iran’s nuclear programme mounts, so do the challenges to Armenia." In another article Sergei Markedonov discusses the background for the proposal to rename Azerbaijan and says that someone in Baku is trying to raise the stakes.

Azerbaijan is unlikely to change its name soon, but one suspects we will be hearing more on this issue in the weeks and months to come.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: ethnic map of Iran, courtesy of farsi.net

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)