Iran's complex relations with the South Caucasus. Sergey Markedonov and Richard Giragosian comment on Iran's relations with the region.

A few days ago a rather bizarre discussion took place in the Parliament of Azerbaijan, a place not usually known for surprises or spontaneity. One MP stood up to propose that Azerbaijan should change its name and be known forthwith as North Azerbaijan. Another stood up to support his idea, followed by another, and another. The incident created quite a lot of attention and speculation.

The incident highlighted the complex relations of Iran with the South Caucasus, a region that for centuries was occupied by Persians and that still shares many legacies of this period. There are then the millions of people in todays Iran that are ethnic Azeris as the map shows. In recent years some political circles in Baku have started referring to the area where these Azeris live as South Azerbaijan. The members of parliament by suggesting that Azerbaijan be called North Azerbaijan, were bringing attention to this point, without saying much about.

Iran also has a complicated relationship with Armenia. An influential Armenian community lives in Tehran where it is allowed to practise its religion and customs. In the current complicated geopolitical situation Iran and Armenia have maintained good warm relations with each other.

Two of our regular contributors discuss Iran's complex relations with the South Caucasus. Richard Giragosian in his piece for the English edition says "Armenia’s relationship with Iran that raises concerns and poses challenges.  And as the West imposes ever tighter sanctions against Iran and the threat of military action over Iran’s nuclear programme mounts, so do the challenges to Armenia." In another article Sergei Markedonov discusses the background for the proposal to rename Azerbaijan and says that someone in Baku is trying to raise the stakes.

Azerbaijan is unlikely to change its name soon, but one suspects we will be hearing more on this issue in the weeks and months to come.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: ethnic map of Iran, courtesy of farsi.net

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular