Menu

Great Expectations

The meeting of the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Kazan on June 25 is being talked up as a possible moment of breakthrough on the Karabakh conflict

The Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet in Kazan on 25 June at the invitation of the Russian President Dimitri Medvedev in the latest attempt to resolve the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. This will be the latest in a series of summits involving the three Presidents that have taken place since they signed the Moscow declaration on 2 November 2008, pledging to work for the resolution of the conflict.

Since than there have been few signs of progress in the negotiations, and many observers consider that the situation on the ground has in fact deteriorated and made the possibility of an outright resumption of the conflict more likely. Kazan may therefore provide the last chance for the current negotiations format, which is led by three OSCE countries, France, the United States and Russia, known as the Minsk Group co-Chair. Since 2008 Russia has played the role of primus inter pares in the troika, and President Medvedev has invested a lot of time and personal political prestige in the process.

Realistically what can be achieved in Kazan is only symbolic. The two sides may agree on the set of principles that have been discussed and negotiated for a number of years. This will open the way for more negotiations around a detailed peace plan. It is hoped however that if there is agreement on the principles this would defuse the tense situation on the line of control, enable confidence building measures to be implemented, and start the long and arduous road to peace.

Agreement on the principles will not be easy, since Azerbaijan's demands for territorial integrity need to be reconciled with Armenia's demands for self determination for the people of Karabakh. Some say that the two principles are not reconcilable and that discussing these basic principles as a prerequisite has been a false strategy. However diplomats are now hopeful that they have been able to find language that is ambiguous enough to be accepted by both sides.

All eyes will therefore be on Kazan, because the stakes are high and failure may increase further the tensions. Diplomats therefore talk of "hope" but experience of the negotiations has taught them not to talk of "optimism".

 

report prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

photo: Presidents Aliev, Medvedev and Sargsyan signing the Moscow declaration on 2 November 2008.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan votes in referendum on important constitutional changes

Kazakhstan votes in referendum on important constitutional changes

Voting is taking place on Sunday (15 March)  in Kazakhstan in a nationwide referendum on a new draft Constitution. According to the Central Referendum Commission of Kazakhstan, 12,046,617 citizens are eligible to participate in the referendum. 359 international observers and 206 foreign journalists were accredited to monitor the referendum in order to ensure the transparency of the voting process. International organizations monitoring the referendum include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the CIS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization of Turkic States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The Central Referendum Commission must announce the final results of the vote within seven days after the referendum. A total of 10,401 polling stations are operating inside and outside the country to organize voting. 71 of them were opened at diplomatic missions in 54 countries. If citizens support the proposed changes, the new Constitution will enter into force on July 1, 2026. After that, elections for a new parliament are planned in the country, and these elections are expected to be organized by the end of August. The position of vice president will be implemented after the formation of the new parliament. The referendum is the fifth in the history of independent Kazakhstan and may lead to the adoption of a new fundamental law that will determine the direction of the country's political and legal development in the coming years. The Referendum is being held at the initiative of the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and envisages the implementation of large-scale constitutional reforms in the country. According to the submitted draft, approximately 84 percent of the text of the Constitution has been updated and new articles and sections have been developed. The question on the ballot paper asks, "Do you accept the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan?" Voters express their position by answering "for" or "against" this question. Currently, the Constitution adopted on August 30, 1995, is in force in Kazakhstan. Since its adoption, the document has been repeatedly amended and supplemented. The latest amendments entered into force in September 2022. However, the scale of the proposed reforms necessitated the preparation of a new Constitutional document. Thus, the amendments cover approximately 84 percent of the text of the existing basic law. The draft of the new Constitution was presented to the public in early February 2026. After the document was published, the country's citizens were given more than a month to familiarize themselves with it and discuss the proposed changes. (Click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)