When diplomacy and democracy collide. Obama makes another attempt to appoint an Ambassador in Azerbaijan by nominating Richard Morningstar.

President Barak Obama has nominated Richard L. Morningstar as the new United States Ambassador to Azerbaijan in an effort to try to close a battle between the administration and congress on American representation in Baku. For much of the time of the Obama administration there has not been a United States Ambassador in Azerbaijan, and whatever American officials say in trying to put a brave face on the situation most observors consider this a failure of the American political system.

Richard L. Morningstar has been serving for the last years as US Secretary of State’s Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy, and in that capacity has already had contacts with Azerbaijan and has visited the country on numerous ocassions. His nomination is not likely to be controversial.

Many of the problems connected with the US diplomatic representation in Azerbaijan are the result of efforts of US congressmen reacting to feelings amongst voters of Armenian origin in their constituencies.

The first choice of the Obama administration for Ambassador in Baku was Mathew Bryza, former Assistant Secretary of State during the Bush administration, and also former co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Process. Armenian diaspora groups were unhappy with his nomination from the start and accused Bryza of being "too pro-Azerbaijani", also citing the fact that he had a Turkish wife. The Whitehouse persisted with its choice, and at the end of 2010 it used a provision in the rules of appointment of American envoys to appoint Bryza by Presidential order at a time when Congress was in recess. Under this provision an envoy can serve for one year during which time the Congress will consider his nomination or the envoy will be withdrawn. Since the congress did not confirm Bryza's nomination he was recalled at the end of 2011.

Many considered Bryza an able and charismatic diplomat who had a good rapport with the Azerbaijani leadership and who was well placed to engage with the Azerbaijani government on sensitive issues such as the Karabakh conflict and human rights in a positive way, and that the efforts to block his nomination were counter productive.

This situation has baffled not only the Azerbaijani government, but also most of the international community which expected to have a stable American diplomatic presence in Baku during the time when the country is becoming increasingly important in regional and international issues, and also at a challenging time for the country's internal political development.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: This is a classic case where diplomacy and democracy have collided. The American system of checks and balances gives the US Congress rights on the appointment of US Ambassadors. Electoral considerations have caused US Congressman to intervene in an area of foreign policy in a somewhat controversial way, but the administration had no choice but to bow its head to their views. It is now hoped that Congress will move fast with the appointment of Morningstar so that there will be a stable American diplomatic presence in Baku as soon as possible.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: A general view of the building of the US Congress in Washington DC (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.