Representative of Yedinaya Rossiya: There are no political obstacles in the way of Armenia's accession to Eurasian Economic Union

Yerevan, November 14. ArmInfo.

There are no political obstacles in the way of Armenia's accession to the Eurasian Economic Union, the existing complexities are actually technical problems, Andrey Klimov, representative of the Yedinaya Rossiya Party, member of the Federation Council, Coordinator of the Eurasian Dialogue, told ArmInfo.  

Though the stance of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan is that the future Eurasian Economic Union should not be expanded abruptly, nevertheless, the given project is aimed at stimulating the integration processes not only in the post-Soviet, but also Eurasian space. "As regards Armenia's accession to this organization, there is only one technical problem - the lack of common borders with the member countries of this structure. Numerous technical problems arise amid the lack of common borders; for instance, the goods are declared in one place and go via a transit territory. I do not want to say that it is an insoluble problem, but obviously it is not a political problem", he said.     

He pointed out the example of Great Britain, which is a member of the European Union but has no common land borders with the EU. "Another example is the Kaliningrad region, which has no common borders with Russia, but it is a part of our country. So, the precedents exist, and the given topic needs professional debates", he said.

In November 2011 the Presidents of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan signed a declaration on Eurasian economic integration aimed at creation of the Eurasian Economic Union.  

In early October 2011 Vladimir Putin said that the Eurasian Economic Union will be neither a new USSR, nor a new CIS, it will effectively link Europe and the Asia-Pacific region and will coordinate the economic and currency policies.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)