POLISH PRESIDENT CONCLUDES SUCCESSFUL VISIT TO SOUTH CAUCASUS

The visit of the President of Poland, Bronislaw Komorowski to Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia was meant to send several signals.

Poland is sending a clear message that as one of the largest members of the European Union  it is determined to leave its mark on the EU foreign policy. The Caucasus, together with Eastern Europe, are Poland's prioirty areas in this regard. The visit by the Polish President to the three South Caucasus countries within days of his country assuming the EU Presidency was an expression of both the interest of Poland in the region and an expression of support for its future. Nowadays, in the debating chambers of Brussels the now not so new EU member states of Eastern and Central Europe take the lead whenever there is a discussion on the South Caucasus, and Poland is usually in the forefront.

Warsaw is also sending a message to Russia that a belt of countries running from the Baltic Sea to the Caspian Sea is emerging - areas that were traditionally in Russia's sphere of influence, but who today pursue their own very disticnt and independent forieign policy.

The first stop of the Polish leader was in Azerbaijan, important for Poland both politically and economically.

In Baku the Polish and Azerbaijani leaders reviewed a whole range of issues and signed agreements on foreign policy, culture, economy and science were signed between Polish and Azeri ministries in the presence of Komorowski and Aliyev. The documents signed included a 2011-2013 cultural partnership agreement, a veterinary partnership agreement and an agreement for non-visa traffic for diplomatic passport holders.

"Poland remains highly interested in the construction of transfer systems which would help Poland solve its energy problems, but first and foremost they would be important solutions for the whole EU" said Komorowski at a joint press conference with the president of Azerbaijan.

\He emphasised that this pertained both to the gas pipeline and "to an old project, funds for which have been already granted from the EU – the Odessa-Brody-Płock-Gdańsk pipeline". Komorowski assured that the project had not been abandoned.

"Poland is very interested in the progress of Azerbaijan talks with EU institutions regarding prospects for association and inclusion in an area governed by uniform economic rules," the Polish president added.

From Baku the Polish president travelled to Batumi where he met President Saakashvili and other Georgian officials. Georgia strikes a cord with Polish sensibilities because is perceived as having stood up to Russia. Yet Poland also recently has been trying to manage its relations with Russia better and president Kormorowski is likely to have advised his Georgian colleague to do the same.

Before leaving for Yerevan the Polish President also met with civil society representatives and visit the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) headquarters in Tbilisi, which is now headed by a Polish General.

The polish leader also visited Armenia, the state in the South caucasus with the closest relations with Russia. Despite this Komorowski was keen to express full support for Armenia's further integration with European institutions and to praise Armenia's efforts at economic reform.

In the South Caucasus the Polish president extended invitations to the presidents of the three countries to participate in the EU Eastern Partnership Summit which will be held in Poland in September. This summit, held under polish chairmanship is likely to provide an important opportunity for the EU to showcase the qualitative improvement in the relations with its neighbours to the East.

A group of Polish businessmen accompanies the President on his trip and business forums were held in the three countries. Poland is keen to develop trade with the region, to engage with Azerbaijan on energy issues and generally to see its presence in the region increased.

All in all this has been a very successful visit and one that is likely to bear useful results in the months and years ahead, not only for Poland but also for the region and for the EU in general.

prepared by the commonspace.eu newsroom with additional reporting from the website of the president of Poland. Pictures courtesy of the press Service of the president of Poland and the Press Service of the president of Armenia

(c) commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)