Menu

Is "more for more" about to become "less for less"?

The European Union is being forced to review its whole strategy towards its Eastern neighbourhood after a series of setbacks in the field of human rights and democratic governance in several of the six partner countries.

When launched, the Eastern Partnership was hailed as a mechanism that would allow the EU's six immediate neighbours: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to benefit from closer relations with the European Union, generous economic assistance and prospects for further integration. The slogan "more for more" was coined - partner countries would benefit more if they do more in the field of reforms, both political and economic.

Over the last months however, the record of several of the six partner countries with respect to human rights, basic freedoms and democratic governance has gone from bad to worse. First there was Belarus with which the European Union has had a troubled relationship for many years. Things came to a head at the Eastern Partnership summit in Warsaw at the end of September when the partner countries refused to join the EU in condemning Belarus. 

There are outstanding issues, and new ones have recently arisin, with the countries of the South Caucasus too.

However, the decision of a Kiev court to sentence former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko to seven years imprisonment, turns what has so far been a problem into a crisis. The European Union - together with the US, the UK, Russia and the Secretary General of the UN - have condemned the Kiev judgement and pretty much accused the Ukrainian government of persecuting its opponents. This when Kiev has the Chairmanshiup of the Council of Europe and will soon have the Chairmanship of the OSCE.

The statement from the European Union states clearly that the EU will now need to reflect again on its whole relationship with Ukraine. Whilst the peaceful and orderly transition of power from President Yushenko to President Yanokovich marked a high point in Ukraine's political maturity, Timoshenko's imprisonment is a sign of how much things have deteriorated since.

The European Union cannot ignore events in its Eastern neighbourhood.  It could be that "more for more" may be about to become "less for less".

This comment was prepared by the www.commonspace.eu editorial team

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Updated: Kazakhstan approves important constitutional changes

Updated: Kazakhstan approves important constitutional changes

Kazakh voters in a referendum on Sunday approved a new constitution, exit polls showed. Two exit polls said around 87% of voters had backed the new constitution. Turnout stood at 73%, the electoral commission earlier said. The new constitution streamlines the country's parliament, and recreates the office of vice president, which was abolished in 1996. According to the Central Referendum Commission of Kazakhstan, 12,046,617 citizens were eligible to participate in the referendum. 359 international observers and 206 foreign journalists were accredited to monitor the referendum in order to ensure the transparency of the voting process. International organizations monitoring the referendum include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the CIS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization of Turkic States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The Central Referendum Commission must announce the final results of the vote within seven days after the referendum. A total of 10,401 polling stations operated inside and outside the country to organize voting. 71 of them were opened at diplomatic missions in 54 countries. The new Constitution will enter into force on July 1, 2026. After that, elections for a new parliament are planned in the country, and these elections are expected to be organized by the end of August. The position of vice president will be implemented after the formation of the new parliament. The referendum was the fifth in the history of independent Kazakhstan and leads to the adoption of a new fundamental law that will determine the direction of the country's political and legal development in the coming years. The Referendum was held at the initiative of the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and envisages the implementation of large-scale constitutional reforms in the country. According to the submitted draft, approximately 84 percent of the text of the Constitution has been updated and new articles and sections have been developed. The question on the ballot paper asks, "Do you accept the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan?" Voters express their position by answering "for" or "against" this question. Currently, the Constitution adopted on August 30, 1995, is in force in Kazakhstan. Since its adoption, the document has been repeatedly amended and supplemented. The latest amendments entered into force in September 2022. However, the scale of the proposed reforms necessitated the preparation of a new Constitutional document. Thus, the amendments cover approximately 84 percent of the text of the existing basic law. The draft of the new Constitution was presented to the public in early February 2026. After the document was published, the country's citizens were given more than a month to familiarize themselves with it and discuss the proposed changes. (Click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)