Is "more for more" about to become "less for less"?

The European Union is being forced to review its whole strategy towards its Eastern neighbourhood after a series of setbacks in the field of human rights and democratic governance in several of the six partner countries.

When launched, the Eastern Partnership was hailed as a mechanism that would allow the EU's six immediate neighbours: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to benefit from closer relations with the European Union, generous economic assistance and prospects for further integration. The slogan "more for more" was coined - partner countries would benefit more if they do more in the field of reforms, both political and economic.

Over the last months however, the record of several of the six partner countries with respect to human rights, basic freedoms and democratic governance has gone from bad to worse. First there was Belarus with which the European Union has had a troubled relationship for many years. Things came to a head at the Eastern Partnership summit in Warsaw at the end of September when the partner countries refused to join the EU in condemning Belarus. 

There are outstanding issues, and new ones have recently arisin, with the countries of the South Caucasus too.

However, the decision of a Kiev court to sentence former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko to seven years imprisonment, turns what has so far been a problem into a crisis. The European Union - together with the US, the UK, Russia and the Secretary General of the UN - have condemned the Kiev judgement and pretty much accused the Ukrainian government of persecuting its opponents. This when Kiev has the Chairmanshiup of the Council of Europe and will soon have the Chairmanship of the OSCE.

The statement from the European Union states clearly that the EU will now need to reflect again on its whole relationship with Ukraine. Whilst the peaceful and orderly transition of power from President Yushenko to President Yanokovich marked a high point in Ukraine's political maturity, Timoshenko's imprisonment is a sign of how much things have deteriorated since.

The European Union cannot ignore events in its Eastern neighbourhood.  It could be that "more for more" may be about to become "less for less".

This comment was prepared by the www.commonspace.eu editorial team

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The "Mecca Joint Defence Agreement"" is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The "Mecca Joint Defence Agreement"" is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)