Hilary Clinton tries to keep an American foot through the Caucasus door.

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton will travel to the Caucasus from June 4 to 7, visiting Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey. The US State Department in a statement said that "In all these countries, she will discuss important issues of regional security, democracy, economic development and counterterrorism."

In Armenia on June 4, the Secretary will meet with President Sargsian and other senior Armenian officials. She will also meet with Armenian civil society leaders. On June 5, the Secretary will open the U.S.-Georgia Strategic Partnership Commission plenary session in Batumi, Georgia. She will meet also with President Saakashvili and hold discussions with a broad range of political actors and civil society representatives. The Secretary will travel on June 6 to Azerbaijan to meet with President Aliyev as well as Azerbaijani civil society leaders.

There are high expectations in the region with regards to Clinton's visit. Richard Giragosian of the Regional Studies Center in Yerevan says that the visit is particularly significant for three reasons: the timing, the broader context and the particular itinerary.  He relates the timing to the current election cycle which will see the three countries holding Presidential elections next year, as well as Clinton's own likely move from Secretary of State back to front line domestic politics. As regards context Giragosian mentions Iran and Russia and their specific engagement with the region and on the itinerary  he points out that the visit will end in Turkey which continues to play a leading role in the region. Giragosian expects the Karabakh conflict to be on the agenda during Clinton's talks with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan but does not expect any new American initiative.

A number of non governmental organisations in the region and beyond have appealed to Clinton to focus on human rights and democratisation during the visit.

Dennis Sammut, Director of the British organisation LINKS is somewhat more sanguine. In a comment to Commonspace.eu he said that "the visit is an attempt by Clinton to keep an American foot through the Caucasus door in the face of a revival of Russian attempts to portray the region as being within the Russian sphere of influence. Clinton will send a message to the three leaders that the United States seeks a qualitative improvement in its relations with them bilaterally and regionally. It also sends a message to Russia that the US intends to remain a key player and will not accept Russian hegemony in the region. A string of visits by senior European leaders to the region sends a similar message. It will be interesting to see how far each of the three leaders will respond to the American overtures."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton (archive picture courtesy of the US State Department).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular