Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Commentary

Commentary: Step by step

16 July 2023
commonspace.eu editorial team

On Saturday, 15 July, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan once again met in Brussels, under the auspices of the president of the European Council Charles Michel, to discuss the future of the relations between their two countries after years of war and conflict.

Another meeting, one of dozens that have taken place in the last two years in different parts of Europe and beyond. Many cynics have stopped hoping and stopped watching, dismissing the whole exercise as simply an excuse to perpetuate the status quo. Some blame Armenia, some Azerbaijan, many blame both, and most blame the Russians.

Yet they are wrong. Armenia and Azerbaijan, and their leaders, Nikol Pashinyan and Ilham Aliyev have the unenviable task of reconciling two nations that have been in a bitter conflict for decades. Opinions on both sides are hardened. Their is no road map to follow to pursue peace - the sides are making it up as they go along. The international context is as complicated as can be.

But the two sides have for some time now committed to end this cycle of violence and conflict and seek a comprehensive peace agreement. Easier said than done as they soon found out. Unpacking the issues and trying to solve them has been a painfully laborious process, exacerbated by incidents on the ground, and pockets of hardliners on both sides. Even as they negotiate the two sides continue to exchange vitriolic verbal attacks against each other - just in case.

Yet progress is being made, and yesterday, speaking after the meeting in Brussels, European Council president Charles Michel summed it up

We are going through one of the most comprehensive and vigorous stages of negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

My remarks following the meeting with Prime Minister @NikolPashinyan and @presidentaz: https://t.co/uQ2RkTNIGu

— Charles Michel (@CharlesMichel) July 15, 2023
 

Michel in his summing up of the meeting listed the long list of issues still to be tackled:

"We have just completed our sixth meeting with President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan. We once again had a frank, honest and meaningful exchange of views. Our meeting was the latest in a series of intensive and productive high-level meetings with the participation of the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, Deputy Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers, held since the beginning of May in Brussels, Chisinau, Washington, Moscow and on the bilateral border.

One of the most complete and energetic stages of negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan is taking place. I thanked the leaders for their strong commitment to the peace process and encouraged them to continue to take bold steps to ensure decisive and irreversible progress towards the normalization of relations. While our meeting took place amid an alarming rise in tensions on the ground, I noted an important momentum in political discussions and efforts.

We discussed all items on the agenda.

sovereignty and territorial integrity. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan once again fully reaffirmed their respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of each other, based on the understanding that the territory of Armenia is 29.8 thousand square kilometers, and Azerbaijan - 86.6 thousand square kilometers.

Border delimitation. Both leaders reaffirmed their firm commitment to the 1991 Alma-Ata Declaration as the political basis for the delimitation.

I welcomed the July 12 meeting of the two border commissions. Work has progressed on the development of the statutes of these commissions and the discussion of the principles of delimitation.

And what is very important, the leaders agreed to intensify and speed up the work of the commissions.

Communications . Over the past two months, the parties have also made clear progress in discussions related to the unblocking of transport and economic ties in the region. We discussed the mechanisms of future transport relations, within which the principles of sovereignty, jurisdictions and reciprocity will be respected.

The construction of railway lines must be started immediately. The EU is ready to provide financial support. Some details still require clarification, but positions on this issue are already converging, options are being actively studied.

Humanitarian supplies . We discussed the situation of the Armenian population  of Karabakh and the situation around the Lachin corridor. The current state of affairs is clearly unstable and does not serve anyone's interests. We also discussed possible concrete steps to help bring the situation back to normal.

I stressed the need to open the Lachin road. I also noted Azerbaijan's readiness to equally deliver humanitarian cargo through Aghdam. I consider both options important and encourage humanitarian deliveries from both sides to meet the needs of the population.

I also welcomed the resumption of work of the International Committee of the Red Cross on medical evacuations.

Rights and Security . First of all, the population on the ground should be reassured that their rights and security will be ensured.

In this context, I expressed EU support for a direct dialogue between Baku and representatives of the Armenians living in the former Nagorno- Karabakh Autonomous Region. This dialogue should give confidence, much needed to all participants in the process.

Detainees . We also discussed issues related to the detainees. The leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the gentleman's understanding that the process of releasing soldiers who accidentally changed sides would be facilitated.

I advocated that the detainees be released on both sides.

The importance of closer cooperation in addressing issues related to the fate of missing persons and demining was also discussed. I again urged the parties to share as much information as possible.

Follow up . We have agreed that our teams will stay in close contact to ensure future action on the issues discussed today. Real progress depends on the next steps to be taken in the near future.

As a matter of priority, violence and harsh language must be stopped in order to create the right conditions for peace negotiations and normalization of the situation.

I also confirmed my intention to invite the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to the next meeting in Brussels after the summer, as well as to the next five-party meeting with the participation of the leaders of France and Germany in Granada on the sidelines of the next summit of the European Political Community".

It is clear that what is required now is perseverance and hard work, and a bit of common sense will not go amiss also. The sides must stop the verbal abuse of each other. First, the two governments should instruct their diplomats to speak in a measured way. Too often Armenian and Azerbaijani diplomats have reverted to their comfort zone of complete negativity when addressing each other. They now need to lead be example in the new path of reconciliation. On the ground commanders must tighten discipline to ensure no unnecessary incidents occur. And in wider society those who claim they want peace now need to accelerate their work, not least by urging the many who have sat conveniently on the side whilst the leaders negotiated, to weigh in on the side of peace and negotiations.

Those who hoped for a dramatic breakthrough in the past in the process of Armenia - Azerbaijan normalisation, may have been disappointed at how slow the process moved. Those who still think that peace is a "moment" are mistaken. It is a process that needs to develop step by step. The meeting in Brussels this weekend was certainly a step in the right direction.

source: This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu
photo: Nikol Pashinyan and Ilham Aliyev with Charles Michel in Brussels on 15 July 2023.
 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit
Trending

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

31 October 2026
António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut