Commentary: Maintaining a peaceful environment ahead of Georgia’s election

The United States Ambassador to Georgia, Ian Kelly, this week was quoted as describing the campaign ahead of the 8 October parliamentary elections as "very good and exemplary".  Indeed, those familiar with Georgia's elections history are pleasantly surprised, but point out that there are two weeks of campaigning yet, and of course election day itself, and surprises cannot be excluded.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise.

A number of initiatives have been presented, aimed at ensuring a continued peaceful environment, as the election approaches and things start to heat up.

Tamar Zhvania, Chairperson of the Central Election Commission (CEC) of Georgia and Giorgi Mghebrishvili, Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) of Georgia on Monday signed the memorandum of understanding (MoU).

"Today, we moved to the new step of cooperation, since we aim to ensure safe election environment for everyone, which meets international standards. We intend to organize elections for the voters on a high professional level for the October 8 Parliamentary Elections, where they may perform their civil duty in a completely free atmosphere. We utterly acknowledge the urgency of firm protection of principles of political neutrality and we ensure those principles in the frames of today's agreement", said Tamar Zhvania.

Giorgi Mgebrishvili, after signing the memorandum stated that the CEC and the Ministry of Internal Affairs will actively cooperate to ensure the voting process in a free and safe environment. "I think that proper development of the cooperation between the CEC and MIA will guarantee the essential basis for peaceful, transparent and credible election environment" he said.

Keeping party supporters apart during campaigning

Another initiative came from the ruling Georgian Dream (GD) - the governing party in the country. The Executive Secretary of Georgian Dream, Irakli Kobakhidze presented a memorandum, which provides for the safe environment in the election period.  It says,

"We, participants of the 8 October parliamentary elections, realizing that peaceful elections are a necessary prerequisite for the development of democracy and consolidation of political system in Georgia, realizing that arrangement of counter events against political parties participating in the elections creates the danger of provoking violence, agree to ensure that our activists are distanced from the events held in support of other parties and to take all measures to prevent our activists' interference with the events of other parties''.

Tamar Chugoshvili from the Georgian Dream said that the memorandum is a voluntary statement of intent and not a legal document, and should therefore be universally supported

Eka Gigauri, the head of the respected Georgian NGO Transparency International (Georgia) considers the idea of a memorandum right and justified as long as its conditions are fulfilled by all parties that sign it. This view was echoed by a number of other civil society organisations.

Some political parties agreed to the idea without question. The leader of the Republican Party did not even wait to receive the letter inviting him to sign, he printed it out and signed it in front of journalists. Other opposition politicians including Irma Inashvili, Nino Burjanadze, and  Irakli Alasania also plan to sign the document. Free Democrats will sign the so-called peace document, but Alasania says the document is very weak. "I would like to remind the authorities that it is their obligation to conduct fair elections", he said.

Some political parties see no point in signing the memorandum, initiated by Georgian Dream. The UNM, National Forum, the Labor Party and State for People are not going to sign it.

Georgia's main opposition party, former President Mikheil Saakashvili's United National Movement (UNM), the National Forum, the Labour Party and State for the People coalition have all refused to sign the memorandum.

The UNM said in a statement that the memorandum is "cynical and poorly planned PR stunt" by the GD, saying the ruling team was a major source and threat for provocations.

"We are not going to sign the memorandum, but we promise that the UNM will not disrupt the election campaign of any party," Giorgi Tughushi, a member of the UNM stated.

Mamuka Katsitadze, a member of the New Rights party that is now aligned with opera-singer-turned-opposition-leader Paata Burchuladze's State for the People coalition, labelled the memorandum "a farce", saying his party had no intention in officially heading the GD's call.

Conditions where incidents are likely to happen need to be avoided

With or without a memorandum Georgian political party leaders have responsibilities. Conditions where supporters of different parties are in the same vicinity at the same time create dangers of violence, not only in Georgia but everywhere in the world. They make the work of the law enforcing agencies much more difficult. It is everybody's duty to avoid such occurrences.

The situation has been well summarised by Georgia's leading NGO, the Georgia Young Lawyers Association. In its interim report of the election situation GYLA says the pre-election environment in Georgia, are "normal" and the current climate is calm. The report says that no particularly grave or large-scale violations have been noted [during the pre-election campaign]. In general, the pre-election campaign is taking place in normal conditions. "However recent events including mutual accusations among parties, create the risk of turning the peaceful conditions into a more polarised and tense pre-election campaign. In these circumstances it is very important to see state agencies act with full adherence to the principle of political neutrality and adequately react to every case of violation," said the organisations Chair Ana Natsvlishvili.

If the calm that has prevailed over the last three months of election campaigning remains for the next two weeks and at the elections themselves there will be two winners on 9 October - the first the party that wins the election, and the other, not less important, the Georgian people who could be proud of exhibiting political maturity, as is expected from a modern European state.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise, with reporting from various news agencies and websites.

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)