Azerbaijan’s Parallel worlds. Part 1: The Successes. LINKS Analysis, looks at the achievements of Azerbaijan in the last decade.

LINKS analysis, looks at the achievements of Azerbaijan in the last decade and what the Azerbaijan government would like foreigners to see when they visit the country.  

The Eurovision Song Festival is in in full swing in Baku, and thousands of journalists, musicians and fans are in the Azerbaijani capital for the occasion. Most of them would not have heard that there existed a country called Azerbaijan until recently, let alone that they would visit it.

When it became known last year that Azerbaijan had won the Eurovision festival, and that it would host the 2012 event, the Azerbaijani government immediately made it clear that it would use the occasion to show-case the new Azerbaijan to the world. It was too good an opportunity to be missed, with tens of millions of viewers throughout the world. And there was indeed a lot to show.

Thanks to the oil wealth of recent years Azerbaijan has been going through a period of transformation. On the surface this reflects itself through the changing Baku skyline. Soviet Baku was a functional, rather than a pretty city, and the Azerbaijani government set out to change this. Dozens of iconic buildings sprang up throughout the capital. New cultural facilities have been mushrooming over the last years, and hundreds of old residential buildings have been spruced up. The architectural feel of the city has changed. Yet this outside change is only part of the story.

Azerbaijanis have been changing too. In Soviet times Azerbaijan was generally considered backward. The Communist leadership of the Azerbaijani SSR had to struggle with Moscow to secure places for Azerbaijani students at top Soviet Universities through a quota system rather than on qualification. The first years after independence were years of political turbulence, culminating in a massive defeat in the war with Armenians which resulted in the loss of large chunks of territory. Tens of thousands of displaced people descended on Baku and other towns adding to the misery of people.

Tackling these issues has been the main challenge that the government of Azerbaijan, headed first by Heidar Aliev, and afterwards by his son Ilham, set for itself.

The government had one big advantage: the revenue from oil. Managing the oil sector was therefore the first objective. An agreement with Western companies and countries, known as the “deal of the century”, secured a smooth production process. The construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline ensured the transportation of oil to European markets, bypassing the Russian bottle neck. Revenues started flowing in, first in small amounts, but in the last five years in billions.

From being the country of losers and refugees the government sought to turn Azerbaijan into a country of winners. A new sense of confidence was encouraged.

This reflected itself in foreign policy, where the government became much more assertive on the international arena. The message to Turkey, the US, Russia, Iran and others in the last years was not to take Azerbaijan fore-granted. Friendship was reciprocal and Azerbaijan expected to get as much as it would give. The election of Azerbaijan to the UN Security Council at the end of 2011 was seen as the culmination of this successful policy.

On the domestic front the government moved to rehouse refugees, to start building the non-oil sector of the economy, to invest heavily in defence spending and to implement a cadre policy aimed at preparing a new generation of Azerbaijanis technocrats. Hundreds of young Azerbaijanis were sent to study overseas, and specialised institutions, such as the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy were established.

Success was also sought in the fields of sports and culture. Sports facilities were brought up to world standard and various international events were held in Baku. Azerbaijani started winning gold medals in competitions.  The Eurovision victory symbolised yet another benchmark reached.

The government of Azerbaijan feels that it has achieved the objectives that it set out to achieve. The country’s statehood is secured, the country is on the road to development and it is now a respected international player.

Tomorrow, in part 2: The failures.

Source: This is the first of a three part special report prepared exclusively for commonspace.eu by LINKS analysis ©

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)