The award of the Nobel peace prize to the EU is well deserved. Regardless of its critics it has been a force for good in Europe and the world.

The announcement that the Nobel Committee has awarded this year's Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union took many by surprise.

The EU is more often than not the subject of criticism, and even ridicule, not least from some of the leaders of its own member states.A lot of the criticism is justified. The EU's bureaucracy is far too heavy. It tramples on the world stage like an elephone, at times when the speed of a gazelle is much more appropriate. Despite all promises of a more streamlined decision making process it often gets caught into squabbles between the member states, leaving everybody else utterly frustrated. The crisis in the Euro zone over the last years has also raised questions on the very existance of the so called "European project".

However to see only this side of the EU is not right. The Union has been instrumental to maintain peace on the European continent. It has helped to bring millions of European citizens living in underdeveloped areas of the continent out of proverty through its policy of cohesion and solidarity. It has helped the countries of Eastern Europe make the transition from Communism after 1989. It has also been generally a force for good in the world. The EU has championed human rights, including freedom of speech, the abolishment of the death penalty, the fight against torture, the rights of women and gay people and other basic freedoms, first by leading with example within its borders, but also by promoting human rights world wide.

The EU has also been more ready to use soft power in its dealings with the rest of thew world than military force.

It is not a perfect record by any means, but overall it is a record of impressive achievements.

The award of the Nobel Peace prize to the EU must now do two things. It must strengthen the voice of those who want the EU to be more active in promoting human rights and the peaceful resolution of conflicts. They must use the prize as a means of holding the EU member states and institutions to account on their performance on these issues. And on their part the member states and the EU institutions must now rise to the occasion. On the eve of another round of budget negotiations funds for this work need to be ringfenced against cuts.

This is the time to celebrate Europe's success in the important areas of human rights and peaceful resolution of conflicts. It is also the time to build on these successes and map out the way forward.

source: commonspace.eu editorial team.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.