BAKU WANTS TO START WORK ON A MAJOR KARABAKH PEACE TREATY

Azerbaijan has proposed starting work on a major peace treaty with Armenia to resolve the Karabakh conflict, the foreign minister has said.

Interviewed by Azerbaijani news agency Trend, Elmar Mammadyarov said he had made the proposal during recent talks with the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, the international body mediating a settlement to the conflict.

"During my visit to New York to attend the UN General Assembly, I had consultations with the American and Russian co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, which were also attended by Andrzej Kasprzyk, the special envoy of the OSCE chairman-in-office," the minister said.

“The consultations aimed to evaluate the situation and identify directions for our future action. We understand that great work has been done and general contours have been defined. Work is under way on the details at the moment.

"Azerbaijan's position is known. It has been impossible to agree on the principles so far, therefore we suggested starting work on a major peace agreement, with understanding and consideration of all the details currently outstanding in the talks," Elmar Mammadyarov said.

"In my speech at the UN General Assembly I set out again the parameters of a conflict settlement envisaged by Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani side is committed to continuing the peace talks and we understand where the problem is.

"We also understand that a huge amount of work has been done with the OSCE Minsk Group in order to draw the contours for peace, stability and, most importantly, predictability in the region, and we are ready to continue work on this."

The minister acknowledged the difficulties of the peace process. "Baku always proceeds from the fact that the Karabakh conflict is very complicated and delicate, and at the same time very emotional. The task of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs is not so easy, but when three permanent members of the UN Security Council - the US, Russia, France - act as mediators, we cannot expect a better format."

Ways of approaching a solution are another subject, Mammadyarov said. "There is the peace-making approach, when the sides come themselves to agree to the proposals made to them. The second option is to enforce peace, that is, to eliminate the consequences of the armed conflict with a political decision on a final settlement. But as you can see, both approaches are phased, of course, which is what we are moving towards."

He said that the collision of many interests in a small area like the South Caucasus had to be taken into account. "Whenever new elements appear, like the factor of gas contracts, they may, on the one hand, help a solution and, on the other, create obstacles. If we take a sober view of the question, then best format is the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs with the three permanent members of the UN, which I would say, should bring peace and stability to the region."

Territorial integrity

Elmar Mammadyarov stressed to Trend that self-determination for Nagorno-Karabakh should not be contrary to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

"Under the UN Charter, only people who have been colonized and nobody else, has the right to self-determination. After expelling the Azerbaijani population of Karabakh, how can the Armenians now talk about self-determination? Where is the logic? And to talk about democracy in Nagorno-Karabakh is an absurdity.

"Expelling all the Azerbaijanis from Karabakh and saying that we are a democratic state, and now we are going to determine our status and let the world accept us as we are... I cannot find a logical explanation of Armenia's position," Mammadyarov said.

He was commenting on Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan's remarks to the UN General Assembly that two decades ago, the people of Nagorno-Karabakh had exercised their right to self-determination and survived war and bloodshed to earn their freedom.

Mammadyarov said that he had not seen a more destructive position during his diplomatic career.

"A phrase like 'Armenia gained the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh at the expense of the blood of its sons' defies logic," the minister said.

The Azerbaijani foreign minister described the Armenian president's statement at the UN General Assembly as an aggressive and outspoken call for war.

 source: news.az

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israel destroys 17 UNIFIL Cameras

Israel destroys 17 UNIFIL Cameras

Israeli forces destroyed 17 surveillance cameras linked to the United Nations peacekeepers’ main headquarters in southern Lebanon in 24 hours, a UN security official told AFP on Saturday. Since the start of the Israel-Hezbollah war on March 2, the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has been caught in the crossfire in the country’s south, with Hezbollah launching attacks on Israel and its troops, and Israeli forces pushing into border towns. The official, who requested anonymity, said “17 of the headquarters’ cameras have been destroyed by the Israeli army” in the coastal town of Naqura. UNIFIL spokeswoman Kandice Ardiel told AFP on Saturday that “the cameras appear to have been destroyed by some kind of laser.” She added that “(Israeli) soldiers are present in Naqura and have been undertaking massive demolitions of buildings in the village this week.” Earlier this week, Ardiel told AFP that “not only have these demolitions destroyed civilian homes and businesses, but the strength of the blasts have caused damage to UNIFIL’s headquarters.” Three Indonesian peacekeepers from the UN force have been killed in two separate incidents over the past week. UNIFIL also reported Friday an “explosion” in one of its bases near Odaisseh in south Lebanon that wounded three personnel, adding that they “do not yet know the origin of the explosion.” The Israeli army accused Hezbollah of firing “a rocket that landed in a UNIFIL outpost.” The UN office in Jakarta said on Saturday the wounded were Indonesian. Indonesia condemned the incident as “unacceptable,” saying “these events underscore the urgent need to strengthen protection for UN peacekeeping forces amid an increasingly dangerous conflict situation.” According to the UN, 97 force members have been killed in violence since its establishment in 1978 to monitor the withdrawal of Israeli forces after they invaded Lebanon.
Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)