Azerbaijan's attempts to push its resolution on Nagorno-Karabakh bypassing OSCE MG will be cut short by the latter

Today the Azeri and Armenian authorities do not trust each other and are waging an open information war. They are trying to use any tribune and opportunity for gaining the upper hand. Therefore, Azerbaijan's non-permanent membership and now chairmanship in the UN Security Council was good news for the Azeris and bad news for the Armenians – for both sides perfectly knew that this would be used in their information war, Arif Yunusov, Head of the Conflict Studies and Migration Department of the Institute for Peace and Democracy, said an interview to ArmInfo.

On May 1 Azerbaijan took up the chairmanship of the UN Security Council and right afterwards President Aliyev used that tribune to accuse Armenia of terrorism against Azerbaijan.

"Had Armenia been in Azerbaijan's place, President Sargsyan would have also tried to use that tribune for accusing Azerbaijan and Turkey. So, to me Aliyev's speech is normal. The question is how effective it was and what it will give Azerbaijan. Of course, all this information war is creating new obstacles to the settlement. If the Armenian and Azeri presidents trusted each other, everything would be different, but this, alas, is not so," Yunusov said.

The expert is a realist and perfectly understands that Azerbaijan will use the Security Council's tribune for propaganda only and will not be able to push its resolution bypassing the OSCE MG. "Should there be such an attempt, it will be cut short by the MG co-chairs," Yunusov said.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
A shortened EU-China summit on Thursday will be a test for both sides

A shortened EU-China summit on Thursday will be a test for both sides

European Council President, Antonio Costa, Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, and EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Kaya Kallas, will travel to Beijing next week to participate in the EU-China summit on Thursday (24 July). The summit has already been cut from two days to one, reflecting an increasing realisation on both sides that the chance of making progress on many issues in the bilateral agenda is small. The summit on 24 July, coincides with the 50th anniversary of relations between China and the EU, and no doubt China will want to throw a party. Chinese President, Xi Jinping, and prime minister, Li Qiange, are expected to participate in the summit. But the feeling in Brussels is that in the fifty years China had failed to create a level playing field. Whilst Chinese companies, academics and individuals had a free hand in the open European system across the continent, European companies struggled to exist , let alone compete, in China. In a key speech in 2023, van der Leyen spoke about the need of the EU to “de risk” its ties with China. But the issue that has really marred relations is Ukraine. China has failed to understand the significance of the situation in Ukraine for Europe. Chinese support for the Russian position diplomatically, as well as more tangibly, has cast a serious cloud over relations. This was seen clearly a few days ago in a four hour meeting in Brussels, between Kallas and Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, described as being “respectful, but tense”.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
A shortened EU-China summit on Thursday will be a test for both sides

A shortened EU-China summit on Thursday will be a test for both sides

European Council President, Antonio Costa, Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, and EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Kaya Kallas, will travel to Beijing next week to participate in the EU-China summit on Thursday (24 July). The summit has already been cut from two days to one, reflecting an increasing realisation on both sides that the chance of making progress on many issues in the bilateral agenda is small. The summit on 24 July, coincides with the 50th anniversary of relations between China and the EU, and no doubt China will want to throw a party. Chinese President, Xi Jinping, and prime minister, Li Qiange, are expected to participate in the summit. But the feeling in Brussels is that in the fifty years China had failed to create a level playing field. Whilst Chinese companies, academics and individuals had a free hand in the open European system across the continent, European companies struggled to exist , let alone compete, in China. In a key speech in 2023, van der Leyen spoke about the need of the EU to “de risk” its ties with China. But the issue that has really marred relations is Ukraine. China has failed to understand the significance of the situation in Ukraine for Europe. Chinese support for the Russian position diplomatically, as well as more tangibly, has cast a serious cloud over relations. This was seen clearly a few days ago in a four hour meeting in Brussels, between Kallas and Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, described as being “respectful, but tense”.