Analysis: China and the South Caucasus

China is a relatively new player in the South Caucasus but has growing interests, particularly in the economic domain. While Beijing established diplomatic ties with Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia in the early 1990s, it largely stayed out of the region’s geopolitics. Armenia acquired Chinese-made WM-80 multiple-launch systems in 1999, but they had little impact on the military balance with Azerbaijan.

Chinese economic ties with the South Caucasus began to grow in the early 2000s, driven by the rapid expansion of its economy. Interest in the region deepened after President Xi Jinping announced the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, with the South Caucasus envisioned as a potential land route connecting China to Europe.

According to World Bank data, between 2005 and 2018 Chinese trade turnover with Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia surged by approximately 2,070%, 380%, and 1,885%, respectively. Investments have since increased significantly, though unevenly, across the region.

Since the early 2000s, China has significantly increased its investments in the South Caucasus, but these have yet to be distributed equally. Armenia has attracted the lowest level of Chinese investment among the three nations. Still, bilateral trade continues to grow: in the first nine months of 2024, trade between Armenia and China reached $2.08 billion—a 34.7% increase from 2023. The launch of direct flights between the two countries in September 2024 further underscores their expanding economic ties.

In Azerbaijan, Chinese investment has concentrated on natural resources, infrastructure, and transit. By 2019, Chinese companies had invested more than $800 million in Azerbaijan’s economy, with Azerbaijani companies investing $1.7 billion in China, according to Shahin Mustafayev, Azerbaijan’s then Minister of Economics.

China has made significant investments in Georgia, particularly in ground transportation. In 2017, the Beijing-headquartered Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank provided $114 million to build a bypass around Batumi, facilitating international transit at a strategic location near the Black Sea. The Hualing Group, a prominent Chinese investor, has also developed large-scale projects, including residential areas near the Tbilisi Sea, the Tbilisi Sea Plaza shopping mall, and a free industrial zone in Kutaisi. A 2017 free trade agreement between Georgia and China has further boosted trade and investment.

China’s engagement with the South Caucasus has deepened in the last two years. Georgia signed a statement on strategic partnership with China in July 2023 focused on four domains—political, economic, people to people and culture, and international. The two sides reaffirmed their respect for all countries’ sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, and Georgia firmly adhered to the One China principle. Both sides expressed readiness to facilitate mutual investment and trade and promote cooperation in transportation, communications, infrastructure modernisation, development and strengthening of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Corridor (“Middle Corridor”), digital technologies, manufacturing, upgrading and expansion of railway networks, agriculture and food safety, and water resources. Georgia awarded the construction of a new deep sea port in Anaklia to a Chinese consortium in 2024.

Azerbaijan followed suit, signing a joint strategic partnership statement with China in July 2024. In the statement, the sides affirmed their commitment to mutual respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty; Azerbaijan firmly supported the One China principle, recognised the existence of only one China in the world, that Taiwan was an inalienable part of Chinese territory, and firmly opposed “Taiwan independence” in any form. Both sides agreed to promote projects in transport and communications, green energy, processing and manufacturing, infrastructure, the digital economy, and agriculture. At the same time, China expressed its readiness to actively participate in constructing and operating the Middle Corridor.

China’s increased interest in Central Asian, trans-Caspian, and South Caucasus routes is not just about economic efficiency—shortening cargo transportation time. At the heart of China’s interest in the South Caucasus is geography. The region offers a strategic link between China and Europe, mainly through the Middle Corridor. China formally joined the Middle Corridor in 2024, and the China Railway Container Transport Corporation contributed to its development. This alignment is part of a broader strategy to diversify trade routes and mitigate risks from potential instability elsewhere. The Middle Corridor—extending from China through Kazakhstan, the Caspian Sea, the South Caucasus, and Türkiye—provides Beijing with a critical alternative to traditional sea routes, and the Northern Corridor through Russia, which faces geopolitical and logistical challenges.

China’s growing involvement in the South Caucasus remains primarily driven by economic and infrastructure projects with less emphasis on regional geopolitics, though recently we saw the increase in military cooperation between China and Azerbaijan as the Azerbaijani minister of defense visited China in October 2023. The Main Directorate of International Military Cooperation of the People’s Liberation Army of China delegation visited Azerbaijan in June 2024. While China lags behind Russia, Türkiye, Iran, the European Union, and the United States in shaping the geopolitics of the South Caucasus, this may change as the global order shifts from a unipolar to a multipolar structure.

Future Prospects

All three countries have been working to advance their ties with China for economic gains and to give themselves more leverage in their relations with global and regional players. As China’s economic growth continues, it will increase its involvement in the South Caucasus, and regional states should be ready to exploit the opportunities.

Source: Benyamin Poghosyan is a Senior Fellow on foreign policy at APRI Armenia and the founder and Chairman of the Centre for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)