European Parliament resolution on Saakashvili draws polarised response from Georgian politicians

On Wednesday (15 February) the European Parliament adopted a resolution by a vote of 577 MEPs to 33 calling for on Georgian government to release the imprisoned ex-President Mikheil Saakashvili and to allow him to receive medical treatment abroad.

The resolution expresses MEPs' "grave concern about the deteriorating health of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and the inadequate response by the Georgian authorities so far", saying that Saakashvili's case is a "litmus test of the Georgian government’s commitment to European values and its declared European aspirations, including EU candidate status".

The resolution also calls on the Georgian authorities to "release former President Mikheil Saakashvili and allow him to receive proper medical treatment abroad on humanitarian grounds and as a way of reducing political polarization", also saying that were the former President to die in custody, it would be a "blow to Georgian democracy and to Georgia’s international reputation".

"Absurd provisions" vs. "personal vendettas": Georgian politicians' reactions split down party lines

In the highly polarised environment of Georgian politics, it is unsurprising that the reaction of Georgian politicians to the European Parliament's resolution was similarly polarised. Government politicians criticised the resolution - and the European Parliament - in the strongest possible terms, while opposition politicians accused the ruling party of enacting a "personal vendetta" on Saakashvili.

The chairman of the Georgian Dream, Irakli Kobakhidze called the resolution's provisions "absurd" and compared the European Parliament to the Supreme Council of the Soviet Union. Shalva Papuashvili, the Speaker of the Georgian Parliament, said that European Parliament resolutions have become "a source of disinformation and attacks against Georgia"; and Georgian Dream politician Archil Talakvadze said that the resolution was "politically motivated", and "direct pressure on the government".

Meanwhile, Levan Khabeishvili, the chairman of Saakashvili's former party the United National Movement, said that the resolution "makes it clear that [Georgian Dream founder] Bidzina Ivanishvili is carrying out a personal vendetta against Mikheil Saakashvili". Badri Japaridze, from the "Lelo for Georgia" party, said that Saakashvili's imprisonment was "particularly damaging for our country at this historical moment, when the issue of granting the EU candidate status to Georgia should be resolved in a few months".

Pro-EU sentiment remains strong in Georgia

Following Ukraine's application for EU membership in the early days of Russia's full scale invasion, Georgia also submitted an application in March 2022 but, unlike Ukraine and Moldova, was not granted candidate status. Georgian opinion polls suggest that the country is overwhelmingly in favour of joining the EU, with an NDI poll released on 2 February 2023 suggesting that 81% of Georgians support their country joining the EU.

source: commonspace.eu with Civil.ge
photo: agenda.ge
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.