European Parliament resolution on Saakashvili draws polarised response from Georgian politicians

On Wednesday (15 February) the European Parliament adopted a resolution by a vote of 577 MEPs to 33 calling for on Georgian government to release the imprisoned ex-President Mikheil Saakashvili and to allow him to receive medical treatment abroad.

The resolution expresses MEPs' "grave concern about the deteriorating health of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and the inadequate response by the Georgian authorities so far", saying that Saakashvili's case is a "litmus test of the Georgian government’s commitment to European values and its declared European aspirations, including EU candidate status".

The resolution also calls on the Georgian authorities to "release former President Mikheil Saakashvili and allow him to receive proper medical treatment abroad on humanitarian grounds and as a way of reducing political polarization", also saying that were the former President to die in custody, it would be a "blow to Georgian democracy and to Georgia’s international reputation".

"Absurd provisions" vs. "personal vendettas": Georgian politicians' reactions split down party lines

In the highly polarised environment of Georgian politics, it is unsurprising that the reaction of Georgian politicians to the European Parliament's resolution was similarly polarised. Government politicians criticised the resolution - and the European Parliament - in the strongest possible terms, while opposition politicians accused the ruling party of enacting a "personal vendetta" on Saakashvili.

The chairman of the Georgian Dream, Irakli Kobakhidze called the resolution's provisions "absurd" and compared the European Parliament to the Supreme Council of the Soviet Union. Shalva Papuashvili, the Speaker of the Georgian Parliament, said that European Parliament resolutions have become "a source of disinformation and attacks against Georgia"; and Georgian Dream politician Archil Talakvadze said that the resolution was "politically motivated", and "direct pressure on the government".

Meanwhile, Levan Khabeishvili, the chairman of Saakashvili's former party the United National Movement, said that the resolution "makes it clear that [Georgian Dream founder] Bidzina Ivanishvili is carrying out a personal vendetta against Mikheil Saakashvili". Badri Japaridze, from the "Lelo for Georgia" party, said that Saakashvili's imprisonment was "particularly damaging for our country at this historical moment, when the issue of granting the EU candidate status to Georgia should be resolved in a few months".

Pro-EU sentiment remains strong in Georgia

Following Ukraine's application for EU membership in the early days of Russia's full scale invasion, Georgia also submitted an application in March 2022 but, unlike Ukraine and Moldova, was not granted candidate status. Georgian opinion polls suggest that the country is overwhelmingly in favour of joining the EU, with an NDI poll released on 2 February 2023 suggesting that 81% of Georgians support their country joining the EU.

source: commonspace.eu with Civil.ge
photo: agenda.ge
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)