Analyst: "We will see no dramatic, short-term shifts in US policy towards the South Caucasus"

Yerevan, November 23. ArmInfo. 

"The re-election of President Obama means that we will see no dramatic, short-term shifts in US policy towards the South Caucasus," Jeff Sahadeo, a director of the  Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at Carleton University, told TURAN's Washington correspondent. 

Sadaheo thinks that the events in the Middle East, with the current flare-up in Gaza and the Syrian and Libyan issues, will preoccupy the administration's foreign policy, and of course the Afghanistan withdrawal will play a large role.

"The administration will continue efforts to find a solution to Nagorno-Karabakh, but it is unlikely they will bring anything new to the table, perhaps at best pressing the interested parties to do so.

I don't think Washington has ever really taken the initiative, beyond encouraging dialogue through the Minsk process and other avenues, and I am not sure that there is that much more that it can do at this point.  In terms of Nagorno-Karabakh, neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has indicated a significant will to take discussions in a new direction. For the Turkey-Armenian rapprochement, I am sure the last thing Washington wants to do is get entangled in a delicate situation when there are clear political risks at stake.  Any change that will come in these issues will come from the states themselves; if any bold initiatives are produced, then that will increase the pressure on the US administration to get involved," he said.  As for the US-Azerbaijan relations, the analyst said that growth in domestic production of gas and oil means that the US might be slightly less interested in Azerbaijan (and pipeline networks, especially for natural gas) for these reasons, but it remains critical in terms of logistical support to Afghanistan, and, in my mind, could become extremely important as the United States tries to deal with Iran.

"Human Rights is always a fungible issue in US politics, one that guides visions but often gets lost when it comes down to complicated geostrategic negotiations. I think in terms of the region the US government believes that lecturing about human rights can be counterproductive, but it does affect their overall views of a country. Rightly or wrongly, Azerbaijan is seen as the country that has the worst record on human rights and democracy... To the extent that the US public knows anything about Azerbaijan, it is generally lumped in with former Soviet states that have followed authoritarian patrimonial regimes. Many western scholars who have tried to work in the country have found access to documents and long-term visas difficult. If the Azerbaijani government wants to improve its image, in order for example to improve tourism and relationships with the West, concrete, specific steps towards greater pluralism will be helpful," Sadaheo said.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.