Trump says U.S. will license Patriot missile production for Ukraine

 

U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday (July 8), during the NATO summit in Ankara, that the United States would grant Ukraine a license to manufacture Patriot interceptor missiles, a move intended to strengthen Kyiv’s air defence against Russia’s continuing ballistic missile attacks. Speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump said, “We’ll give them the right to make Patriots. We’ll show them how to do it,” describing the Patriot as “a defensive weapon.” He added that the decision had not yet been communicated to defence manufacturers but expressed confidence that the arrangement would proceed.

The announcement did not include details on the timeline, production location or conditions of the proposed licensing agreement. Trump acknowledged that the United States has a limited supply of Patriot systems, stating, “We have Patriots, but we don’t have that many. We need them for ourselves too.” He suggested that licensed production would help Ukraine reduce its dependence on U.S. deliveries and said Ukrainian industry had demonstrated the capacity to manufacture sophisticated weapons.

The proposal follows repeated Ukrainian requests for additional Patriot interceptors, which are regarded as one of the few systems capable of countering Russian ballistic missiles. Although the licensing announcement could strengthen Ukraine’s long-term air defence capabilities, analysts note that Patriot production is technically complex and would take years to establish. According to the Foreign Policy Research Institute, powering Ukraine’s war efforts through manufacturing Patriot missiles in Ukraine will continue to remain out of reach for the foreseeable future: a PAC-3 MSE interceptor requires approximately 24 months, while its rocket motor takes around 30 months to produce. Military experts have also questioned whether such production could safely be established inside Ukraine while Russian long-range strikes continue.

Following the meeting, Zelensky thanked Trump for placing “strong emphasis” on strengthening Ukraine’s air defence and said Ukrainian officials would work to implement the agreements discussed. During his opening address to NATO leaders on 7 July, President Zelensky urged partners to accelerate deliveries of U.S.-made air defence systems, arguing that Patriot interceptors are essential to protect Ukrainian cities from increasingly frequent missile strikes. His appeal followed another wave of Russian drone and ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv at the beginning of the week, with Ukrainian authorities reporting further overnight strikes on 8 July. 

In its summit declaration, NATO pledged €70 billion in military equipment, assistance and training for Ukraine in 2026, while allies committed to maintaining at least equivalent levels of support in 2027. Trump also indicated openness to expanding defence cooperation through the possible purchase of Ukrainian-made drones, although no formal agreement was announced.

Source: commonspace.eu with TIME (Washington DC) and Le Monde (Paris).

 

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)