Trump says U.S. will license Patriot missile production for Ukraine

 

U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday (July 8), during the NATO summit in Ankara, that the United States would grant Ukraine a license to manufacture Patriot interceptor missiles, a move intended to strengthen Kyiv’s air defence against Russia’s continuing ballistic missile attacks. Speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump said, “We’ll give them the right to make Patriots. We’ll show them how to do it,” describing the Patriot as “a defensive weapon.” He added that the decision had not yet been communicated to defence manufacturers but expressed confidence that the arrangement would proceed.

The announcement did not include details on the timeline, production location or conditions of the proposed licensing agreement. Trump acknowledged that the United States has a limited supply of Patriot systems, stating, “We have Patriots, but we don’t have that many. We need them for ourselves too.” He suggested that licensed production would help Ukraine reduce its dependence on U.S. deliveries and said Ukrainian industry had demonstrated the capacity to manufacture sophisticated weapons.

The proposal follows repeated Ukrainian requests for additional Patriot interceptors, which are regarded as one of the few systems capable of countering Russian ballistic missiles. Although the licensing announcement could strengthen Ukraine’s long-term air defence capabilities, analysts note that Patriot production is technically complex and would take years to establish. According to the Foreign Policy Research Institute, powering Ukraine’s war efforts through manufacturing Patriot missiles in Ukraine will continue to remain out of reach for the foreseeable future: a PAC-3 MSE interceptor requires approximately 24 months, while its rocket motor takes around 30 months to produce. Military experts have also questioned whether such production could safely be established inside Ukraine while Russian long-range strikes continue.

Following the meeting, Zelensky thanked Trump for placing “strong emphasis” on strengthening Ukraine’s air defence and said Ukrainian officials would work to implement the agreements discussed. During his opening address to NATO leaders on 7 July, President Zelensky urged partners to accelerate deliveries of U.S.-made air defence systems, arguing that Patriot interceptors are essential to protect Ukrainian cities from increasingly frequent missile strikes. His appeal followed another wave of Russian drone and ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv at the beginning of the week, with Ukrainian authorities reporting further overnight strikes on 8 July. 

In its summit declaration, NATO pledged €70 billion in military equipment, assistance and training for Ukraine in 2026, while allies committed to maintaining at least equivalent levels of support in 2027. Trump also indicated openness to expanding defence cooperation through the possible purchase of Ukrainian-made drones, although no formal agreement was announced.

Source: commonspace.eu with TIME (Washington DC) and Le Monde (Paris).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)