Эксперт:

Беспилотник азербайджанских вооруженных сил был уничтожен оружием армянского производства, что является наглядной демонстрацией колоссального потенциала, имеющегося у отечественной оборонной промышленности. Об этом заявил сегодня на пресс-конференции военный эксперт Арцрун Ованнисян. При этом, согласно эксперту, беспилотник был сбит мобильным средством, исходя из этого, есть все предпосылки того, что в ближайшем будущем научно-технические достижения Армении в военной сфере достигнут новых высот.

По его словам, в мировой боевой практике сбитие бесплотного летательного аппарата - дело весьма сложное, т.к. эти средства довольно таки эффективны при решении поставленных перед собой задач. Более того, сбитый подразделениями Армии Обороны НКР беспилотник был израильского производства, предположительно, это "Гермес-450", а израильские БПЛА известны во всем мире своими тактико-техническими характеристиками.

"Я уверен, что уничтожение БПЛА вызвало шок в Азербайджане, хотя наши соседи пока не очень-то и спешат поделиться своей реакцией. Я также считаю, что израильским производителям БПЛА также есть о чем задуматься", - подчеркнул Ованнисян.

Эксперт также добавил, что сбитый беспилотник был новейшей модели, учитывая, что на нем была маркировка, указывающая дату производства - март 2011 г.

Напомним, что БПЛА азербайджанских ВС был сбит на линии карабахско-азербайджанской линии соприкосновения в направлении Мартуни 12 сентября.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

Farah Karimi, Special Co-ordinator and leader of the short-term OSCE observer mission, said that: “The concentration of arrests and criminal prosecutions against opposition figures contributed to perceptions of selective justice, while a polarized media landscape, inflammatory rhetoric, misinformation, and persistent foreign pressure and interference challenged Armenia’s democratic resilience and the integrity of public debate. This underscores the importance of continued efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, safeguard fundamental freedoms, and foster public trust in democratic processes. ” Damien Cottier, Head of the delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, argued that “The Armenian elections took place in a particularly tense geopolitical context, with direct foreign interference. In particular, pressure and threats from Russian authorities reached an unprecedented and worrying level.” Janez Lenarčič, head of the election observation mission from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, stated that “Armenia’s voters were given – and took – the opportunity to make a genuine choice in a professionally managed election process and a vibrant and pluralistic, if often highly polarized campaign. “Unfortunately, they had to make that choice against the backdrop of unprecedented foreign interference and pressure, in the form of punitive trade measures and day-by-day threats of further negative consequences contingent on which choice they made”. == click image to read full report

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)