Мнение: Азербайджан может внести большой вклад в отношения между Европой и мусульманским миром

Azerbaijan can be a loyal and effective partner in the fight against Islamic radicalization due to its resilience and experience in solving the main problems related to the role of religion in society, Ramazan Samedov argues in this article for commonspace.eu.

For a Muslim-dominated country whose neighbors include Russia, Iran and Turkey, an effective foreign policy is essential for basic survival, and is also an important tool for capitalizing on regional opportunities. Situated at the intersection of major trade and energy routes between East and West, North (Russia) and South (Iran) and supporting a secular state with a Muslim heritage, Azerbaijan is a natural bridge between Europe and Asia, the Muslim and Christian worlds, and a gateway to energy and international transport corridors for your region. As the world tries to combat the global growth of radicalization, Azerbaijan, as a secular state with a Muslim majority, can become a valuable partner for Europe in its search for solutions to the problem of radical Islam.

Despite the fact that more than 90% of the population of Azerbaijan are Muslims, people prefer not to call them as such. Azerbaijan is a member of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and also a member of the Council of Europe. The people of Azerbaijan were shamans, Christians, Sunnis and Shiites at different periods of their history, which was a good tool to defend against external threats. When Russia gets too close, they say they are Muslim; when Turkey does this, they say they are Shiites; when Iran approaches them, they are Turks. Another fact that is interesting to mention is that, according to a recent Gallup poll, Azerbaijan is one of the most secular countries in the Muslim world, with about 53% of respondents indicating the importance of religion in their lives as little or no. The same survey shows

One of the spiritual fathers of Azerbaijan, Mirza Fatali Akhundov, the son of a mullah who became a playwright-philosopher-atheist, was one of the first famous people who began to promote secular ideas in Azerbaijan in the 19th century. To understand the scale of his role in our region, he is compared with Montesquieu, Rousseau and Voltaire in the West, and even called the "Moliere of the East." Akhundov strove to reform the country and develop a secular culture. A few decades after his birth, Azerbaijan had its own theaters, opera halls, newspapers and even a magazine called Molla Nasraddin - possibly the world's first Charlie Hebdo, which published anecdotes and satirical caricatures of Islam and mullahs. These were historical events for the Muslim and Turkic world. This happened over a hundred years ago, but no one was attacked because of this.

Светская жизнь в Азербайджане продолжалась по этой траектории. Это даже отражено в азербайджанском языке - «dunyəvi», азербайджанское слово «светский», буквально переводится как «мирское». В 1918 году во время первой азербайджанской республики состоялась дискуссия о государственном гербе страны - флаге. Мусульманская фракция парламента Азербайджана хотела, чтобы зеленый цвет был в верхней части флага, чтобы представлять сильное исламское наследие страны, однако парламентское большинство приняло решение против этого и, уважая то, что ислам является частью Азербайджана, решил, что зеленый цвет должен быть внизу флага. Над ним синий цвет представляет тюркское наследие страны, а красный - символ прогресса азербайджанской культуры. Это продолжает служить хорошим отражением того, кем являются азербайджанцы - светские аспекты их национальной идентичности предшествуют религии.

Азербайджан был одной из двух стран с мусульманским большинством, которые направили войска в Ирак для поддержки возглавляемой США коалиции во время Второй войны в Персидском заливе, а также внесли свой вклад в международные усилия против талибов в Афганистане. Он также участвовал в программе НАТО «Партнерство ради мира» и с 2005 года заключил Индивидуальное соглашение о партнерстве с этой организацией.

Азербайджан имеет все возможности для того, чтобы играть роль связующего звена между ЕС и его восточным соседством; не только в военном, экономическом и энергетическом контекстах, но и в добавлении ценного понимания ислама к европейским усилиям по борьбе с насильственным экстремизмом и его предотвращению.

Несмотря на собственный опыт экстремистских группировок, в частности, очагов салафитских радикалов на севере страны, меры по предотвращению и противодействие радикализации в целом были эффективными наряду с продвижением светских правительственных институтов; демонстрируя, что Азербайджан обладает твердой иммунной системой, когда дело доходит до религиозной радикализации. Все эти факторы усиливают аргумент, что Азербайджан - и светские государства, подобные ему, - может быть лояльным и эффективным партнером в борьбе с исламской радикализацией благодаря своей устойчивости и опыту решения основных проблем, связанных с ролью религии в обществе.

Источник: Рамазан Самедов

На фото: Папа Франциск во время своего визита в Баку в октябре 2016 года вместе с местными лидерами мусульманской, христианской, еврейской и других конфессий

The views expressed in comments and articles do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)